Spousal Alimony Calculation and Payment Rules for each state in USA

Spousal Alimony Calculation and Payment Rules for Alabama

Courts have broad discretion; no fixed formula. Judges award rehabilitative (usually up to 5 years) or periodic support based on statutory factors (each spouse’s income and property, age/health, standard of living, duration, fault, etc.). Rehabilitative awards normally end within 5 years, while periodic alimony typically cannot exceed the length of the marriage (unless very long marriage or exceptional needs). There is no standard percentage or cap; awards are “fair and just” as determined by the court.

Spousal Alimony Calculation and Payment Rules for Alaska

Alaska: No formula; judges decide based on need and ability, considering factors like marriage length, incomes, education/training, contributions, etc.. Types include temporary (“pendente lite”), rehabilitative (for training/education, typically up to ~4 years), and short-term reorientation support (usually ~1 year to adjust to new household). The court has broad discretion and no cap or fixed percentage; it assesses each spouse’s financial needs, assets, standard of living, and prospects.

Spousal Alimony Calculation and Payment Rules for Arizona

Arizona: Since Sept. 2022, AZ statutes require guideline awards (supreme court rules) for divorces >3 years. The spouse seeking support must demonstrate need and the other’s ability. If eligible, guidelines yield an amount and duration range intended to allow self-sufficiency. Judges must apply the guideline amount (which produces a range) unless “inappropriate or unjust”. For low-income couples (combined <$44K), support may be denied. When guidelines don’t apply (e.g. high incomes), courts use statutory factors (similar to other states) including each party’s income, earning capacity, health, age, length of marriage, contributions, custodial needs, standard of living, and fault. Types: temporary (during divorce) and post-judgment (may be term-limited or rehabilitative; permanent support is rare). No standard percentage; awards are set by judicial determination of a fair sum.

Spousal Alimony Calculation and Payment Rules for Arkansas

Arkansas: No formula. Courts award rehabilitative support (for education/training) or, rarely, permanent support for long marriages. Judges “determine what is fair” by considering need of one spouse vs. ability of the other, along with factors like each party’s income, employment potential, assets, lifestyle during marriage, health, standard of living, and contribution to the marriage. Awards can be lump-sum or periodic. There is no automatic cap or percentage; the court decides reasonable amount and term.

Spousal Alimony Calculation and Payment Rules for California

California: The state prescribes a guideline formula for temporary spousal support: typically 40% of the higher earner’s net income minus 50% of the lower earner’s net income. For long-term support, there is no fixed formula; judges consider Family Code §4320 factors – e.g. each spouse’s needs, earning capacity, duration, contributions, age/health, and marital standard of living. By law, for marriages under 10 years support generally is limited to half the marriage length; for longer marriages support may continue indefinitely. Courts strive to ensure the supported spouse’s needs are met up to the couple’s former standard of living, but there is no statutory percentage cap beyond guideline discretion.

Spousal Alimony Calculation and Payment Rules for Colorado

Colorado: The law provides advisory guidelines (C.R.S. §14‑10‑114) for calculating maintenance when combined incomes are ≤$240K and marriage ≥3 years. The initial guideline amount is 40% of combined adjusted gross income minus the lower earner’s share (with tax adjustments if alimony is nondeductible). An advisory term is set by statute (up to 50% of marriage length if ≥20 years). Judges may deviate for reasons such as tax treatment or if the guideline is unjust. Key factors are specified by statute (similar to other states: length, incomes, needs, etc.). If incomes exceed limits or marriage <3 years, judges use factors (same as Arizona’s) to award support. No fixed percentage cap beyond the guideline calculation.

Connecticut: No formula. Courts decide support based on need and ability, using statutory factors (Conn. Gen. Stat. §46b‑82) that include marriage length, each party’s age/health, vocation/earning capacity, education, assets and liabilities, standard of living, fault for breakdown, and custodial responsibilities. Support can be ordered as lump-sum or periodic. An indefinite award (support until death/remarriage) is allowed for long marriages but requires the court to state specific supporting factors. Otherwise term is set as part of the judgment. There is no mandatory percentage or duration table; judges set amount and duration case-by-case.

Delaware: No formula – judge discretion. Factors (like most states) include both spouses’ incomes/resources, length of marriage, standard of living, education/skills, contributions during marriage, custodial duties, and any marital fault. Types include pendente lite (temporary during litigation), rehabilitative/transition (for training or adjustment), and very rarely permanent (generally only for ≥20-year marriages). Awards aim to make the receiving spouse reasonably self-supporting. No fixed percentage or cap; courts determine a “fair” support based on the parties’ financial picture.

Florida: Florida law (Fla. Stat. §61.08) instructs judges to consider broad factors (incomes, health, standard of living, length, contributions, etc.), but practitioners often use the old 30/20 rule as a guideline. Under that (by computation), with minor children in common the guideline is roughly 30% of payor’s income minus 20% of payee’s (no children: 20% minus 30%)dewittlaw.com. However, there is no strict formula by statute and judges have discretion. Notably, post-2023 reforms eliminated permanent alimony: now only four specific categories are allowed (bridge-gap, durational, rehabilitative, and temporary alimony)dewittlaw.com. Durational awards are capped at the length of the marriage (short-term marriages → up to 3 years, moderate 3–17 yrs up to 50% of marriage, long-term 17+ yrs up to 60%) and generally end at retirementdewittlaw.comdewittlaw.com. Bridge-gap (6 months max) and rehabilitative (reasonable term) alimony serve transition. No standard percentage cap beyond these legislative guidelines.

Georgia: No formula. Georgia law requires meeting a need-and-ability threshold first, then allows permanent or rehabilitative alimony (Georgia has no fixed “permanent,” but post-divorce support can continue indefinitely). Judges consider statutory factors (OCGA §19‑6‑5) including marital standard of living, marriage length, health, each spouse’s earning capacity and financial resources, contributions, age, and any marital misconduct. Adultery or desertion can bar or reduce awards. Support terminates on the payee’s remarriage or death. No set percentage or cap applies; judges decide a fair award under the circumstances.

Hawaii: No formula; broad discretion. After finding need, courts evaluate factors including both spouses’ financial resources, earnings, debts, lifestyle during marriage, marriage length, ages/health, and each party’s career and training. Alimony types include: pendente lite (temporary during divorce); short-term support (rehab/transitional for training or adjustment); and long-term (permanent) support (rare, usually only in long marriages with limited self-support). Judges may set fixed-term or indefinite awards. There is no statutory percentage or cap, only the broad “just and equitable” standard.

Idaho: No formula; judge discretion. Spousal support (called maintenance) is awarded only if one spouse cannot meet needs through assets or earning capacity. Courts consider factors like each spouse’s income and resources, marriage length, education/training needed, age/health, marital standard of living, conduct, etc.. Maintenance may be temporary or longer but is usually limited by the dependent spouse’s needs. Courts have broad flexibility and no fixed percent or cap.

Illinois: Illinois has guidelines for determining the amount and duration of maintenance (750 ILCS 5/504). For incomes under $500K, the basic formula is 33⅓% of the payor’s net income minus 25% of the payee’s net income (subject to a 40% combined cap). If combined incomes exceed $500K or circumstances make guidelines inappropriate, courts use statutory factors (750 ILCS 5/504(a)) instead. The law also provides a statutory duration schedule: e.g., support may be awarded up to 20% of marriage length, up to 80% if 19 years, and indefinite for marriages ≥20 years. In practice, Illinois courts first calculate the guideline amount, then adjust as needed based on factors like marriage duration, each party’s needs, earning capacity, and property division. There is no simple flat percentage beyond the guideline calculation.

Indiana: Indiana law tightly limits support. There is no general alimony formula; instead, only certain “maintenance” awards are allowed by statute. If one spouse needs training or support, the court may order rehabilitative maintenance (for education/training) up to 3 years. Permanent alimony is generally barred unless one spouse is incapacitated. Qualifying for maintenance requires showing the recipient lacks property and capacity to be self-supporting. Courts consider factors like the spouses’ education, incomes, and contributions. Judges set the amount and term (max 3 years) as they find fair – there is no standard percentage or cap.

Iowa: No formula. Iowa courts may award “supportive maintenance” when one spouse lacks adequate property to meet needs. Judges consider factors under Iowa Code §598.21A: e.g. marriage length, age, health, property division, income/assets of each spouse, vocational skills/earning capacity, and time needed for the recipient to become self-sufficient. Awards may be temporary or longer, but courts typically expect any support to end once the dependent spouse can support herself. No fixed cap or percentage applies; the award is tailored to the parties’ circumstances.

Kansas: No mandatory formula. Kansas law provides guidelines as “non-binding” aid, but judges need not follow them. Courts set alimony as reasonable and just, considering factors: marriage length, living standard, each spouse’s age/health/education/employability, financial resources (including property division), and contributions to the marriage. Support can be lump-sum or periodic. A key limit is that periodic alimony cannot exceed 121 months (the so-called “121-month cap”) except by agreement. Aside from that cap, there is no percentage formula or fixed amount.

Kentucky: No formula. Kentucky law (KRS §403.200) requires need and ability, then allows alimony as the court finds fair. In practice, judges weigh factors like each spouse’s age, health, earning capacity, education, contribution as homemaker, duration of marriage, and each one’s financial resources and needs. Kentucky recognizes temporary support (pendente lite) and post-divorce maintenance; the amount and duration are entirely discretionary to achieve fairness. There are no standard percentages or caps.

Louisiana: No formula; support is awarded only if one spouse is not at fault and needs assistance. Louisiana law distinguishes interim (temporary) and final periodic support. At interim stage, judges consider need, ability to pay, custody and child support, and living expenses. For final support, courts consider factors including each spouse’s income/assets and obligations, earning capacity, education, age/health, length of marriage, and fault. By law, final support is capped at one-third of the paying spouse’s net income (unless there is evidence of domestic violence). Awards stop upon remarriage/death of recipient. Otherwise, judges set a reasonable amount and term (no other fixed limits).

Maine: No formula. Courts consider detailed factors (Maine Stat. tit. 19‑A §951‑A): length of marriage, each party’s income and assets, employability, education/training needs, health and age, marital standard of living, contributions to family (including homemaking), and any marital fault. Support may be ordered as interim and/or final. Judges set duration case-by-case; indefinite awards require justification. There is no set percentage or cap – awards are tailored to needs and means.

Maryland: No formula. Maryland law (§11‑106) directs courts to weigh factors such as each spouse’s ability to become self-supporting, time needed for education/training, marital standard of living, duration of marriage, contributions, age and health, the payor’s ability to provide, any agreement between spouses, and each party’s financial needs and resources (income, assets, debts). Indefinite alimony (support until death/remarriage) may be ordered only if the dependent spouse cannot become self-supporting due to age, illness or other factors. Otherwise, the court sets a term based on fairness. No percentage guideline or cap exists.

Massachusetts: No fixed formula. State law (§34) gives a guideline range (dependent’s needs vs. payor’s ability), recommending generally no more than 30–35% of the difference in gross incomes. But judges have wide discretion. In awarding alimony, courts consider factors: length of marriage, each party’s age/health, income/employability, contributions to the marriage, tax consequences, and lost career opportunities. For short marriages (<5 yrs) courts often award less; for longer marriages support can extend beyond guideline range if equity requires (e.g. in lieu of property split). There is no statutory cap or mandatory percentage – judges strive for a fair result within those ranges.

Michigan: No formula. Courts use equitable discretion. MCL §552.23 factors include each spouse’s earning capacity, needs based on lifestyle during marriage, duration of marriage, age/health, and any other relevant factor. (“Deciding spousal support… no magic formula; case-by-case”.) Awards may be term-limited or permanent depending on circumstances. No fixed percentage or cap.

Minnesota: No fixed formula. Statute (Minn. Stat. §518.552) lists factors for granting and setting support. Key points: if marriage <5 years, maintenance is usually denied. For 5–19 years, courts may award transitional maintenance up to 50% of the marriage length (subject to certain caps); for 20+ years, maintenance is presumptively indefinite. In all cases, judges consider factors including both spouses’ resources, time needed for training, standard of living, contribution to marriage (including homemaking), age/health, and future earning ability. Maintenance must not exceed the needs difference; there is no simple percentage beyond these guidelines.

Mississippi: No formula. Mississippi recognizes lump-sum or periodic maintenance. Courts consider each spouse’s health and earning capacity, all sources of income, reasonable needs of each (including children’s needs), payment of debts, tax impacts, and any marital misconduct. The goal is to ensure the dependent spouse has reasonable support. Support is discretionary; awards must be “reasonable” and can be terminated on remarriage/death. No standard percentage or cap is set by law.

Missouri: No formula. Missouri statute (§452.335) requires finding need and inability to pay, then directs the court to award “such amounts and periods as the court deems just.” Judges consider factors like each party’s financial resources, age, health, education, employment skills, career interruptions, contributions to the marriage, marital standard of living, property division, marital misconduct, and tax consequences. The amount and duration are entirely up to the court’s discretion. There is no preset percentage or cap.

Montana: No formula. Montana statute (§40‑4‑203) lists factors for maintenance: each spouse’s financial resources and earning capacity, time/training needed, marital standard of living, length of marriage, age/health, and the paying spouse’s ability to pay. Fault is explicitly not considered. Awards can be rehabilitative (short-term) or permanent in long marriages. Courts have broad discretion (“just, fair and equitable” per statute), with no fixed percentage or cap.

Nebraska: No formula. Statute (Neb. Rev. Stat. §42‑365) directs the court to make an equitable division of property and “reasonable alimony” based on circumstances. Factors include duration of marriage, each spouse’s earning ability and career, contributions to marriage (including homemaking and education), child rearing, and ability of the dependent to remain self-sufficient. The court may assign property or order payment as needed “having regard for” each spouse’s ability to pay. Awards are up to the court; no standard percentages or caps are specified.

Nevada: No formula. Under NRS §125.150, courts consider a list of factors similar to others: each party’s financial condition, incomes, assets, liabilities, contributions, marital standard of living, ages/health, employability, education, length of marriage, custody responsibilities, and any marital misconduct. The award must be “just and equitable,” and judges have wide latitude. Alimony can be temporary or permanent. There is no set percentage or cap; amounts are tailored to the parties’ circumstances.

New Hampshire: NH has statutory guidelines for term alimony: the formula generally awards 23% of the income difference (formerly 30% under older law). The duration is capped at 50% of the marriage length (although courts can deviate for fairness). In practice, courts first calculate this guideline “term alimony” amount/duration, then adjust if needed. Judges also consider usual factors (age, health, assets, education, standard of living, etc.) in deciding final support. Despite the guideline, courts must find an award “just and equitable.” For permanent alimony (indefinite support), the court examines factors like inability to become self-supporting, length of marriage, and needs; such awards must be supported by the statutory factors (see RSA 458:19–d). (Sources: NH Judicial guidelines.)

New Jersey: No strict formula. Since 2014 the emphasis is on judge discretion guided by statute (N.J.S.A. 2A:34‑23) and published guidelines (which are advisory). Attorneys often cite the old 30/20% rule for estimation, but NJ law directs courts to weigh nine Sweeney factors: need and ability to pay, marriage duration, standard of living, age/health, earning capacity, parental duties, time to acquire job skills, contributions, property distribution, tax consequences, etc.. Types include “permanent” support (post-divorce), “rehabilitative,” “limited duration,” or “reimbursement” alimony. Courts set amount and length within statutory bounds; for example, short marriages yield temporary support, long marriages can result in indefinite awards. There is no fixed percentage or guaranteed cap – courts must simply ensure an equitable outcome.

New Mexico: No formula. NM law (NMSA 40‑4‑7) lists factors much like other states: each spouse’s income, property and liabilities, time needed to train/educate, health, age, earning capacity, standard of living, length of marriage, and contributions to the marriagelaw.justia.comlaw.justia.com. Judges set an amount they deem fair given these factors. There is no statutory guideline percentage or cap, and awards may be rehabilitative or permanent. Courts also consider any prenuptial agreements and tax impacts.

New York: The law requires the use of mandatory maintenance guidelines for both interim and post-divorce awards (NY DRL §236[B][5-a]), unless applying them would be unjust. Under these rules, the court computes a base award (for example, temporary support uses a formula like 20–30% of payor minus 25–20% of payee, depending on child support obligations). Similarly, post-divorce maintenance is first calculated by formula and a duration schedule based on marriage length. If the formula award (and a 15% of A’s income ceiling) does not meet the supported spouse’s reasonable needs, the court may increase maintenance to cover the gap. Beyond guidelines, the court considers DRL §236[B][6] factors (duration, incomes, property division, age/health, contributions, etc.) to adjust amount and term. Typical practice: for marriages <10 yrs, term alimony often <=1/2 marriage length; for ≥10 yrs, indefinite support may be ordered. There is no arbitrary percentage cap (aside from the guideline ceilings); judges set “need-based” awards within the statutory framework.

North Carolina: No formuladivorcenet.com. NC law (G.S. §50‑16.3A) authorizes alimony if one spouse is “dependent” on the other. In awarding alimony, courts consider factors such as marital misconduct, both spouses’ incomes and earning capacities, age/health, duration of marriage, contributions to the marriage (including homemaking and support of the other’s education), standard of living, tax consequences, and needs of any childrenncleg.netncleg.net. Spousal support can be rehabilitative (time-limited) or permanent; judges determine amount and duration as they deem just. Alimony ends on the dependent spouse’s remarriage or death. No set percentages or caps exist.

North Dakota: No formuladivorcenet.com. Courts may award spousal maintenance if one spouse cannot meet basic needs. Judges consider factors like ages, earning capacities, length of marriage, marital misconduct, assets, debts, and health of each spousedivorcenet.com. Maintenance is often short-term or rehabilitative. There is no statutory percentage or cap; the amount and term are set by the court’s equity.

Ohio: No formulasupremecourt.ohio.gov. Ohio law (R.C. 3105.18) lists 15 factors for determining alimony (each spouse’s income from all sources, assets, duration, standard of living, children’s needs, etc.). The court must find need and ability to pay. Judges have broad discretion to fix amount and duration based on those factorssupremecourt.ohio.govsupremecourt.ohio.gov. Awards typically end on remarriage or a specified date. There is no fixed percentage; courts fashion support to achieve fairness.

Oklahoma: No formuladivorcenet.com. Statute (43 O.S. §109) calls for “reasonable alimony” with regards to paying spouse’s ability to pay. In practice, judges weigh factors (similar to other states) such as marriage length, each spouse’s income/earning capacity, age/health, standard of living, contributions, etc., but Oklahoma law does not enumerate specific factors. Support is modifiable and ends on remarriage/death. No statutory percentage or cap appliesdivorcenet.com.

Oregon: No formula. ORS 107.105 requires the court to award support “as the court deems just,” focusing on: length of marriage, tax consequences, and any factors the court deems relevantdivorcenet.com. Additional factors depend on support type: transitional support (time to train/seek work, custodial duties, etc.)divorcenet.com, compensatory support (spouse’s contribution to other’s career/education, division of increased wealth)divorcenet.com, and maintenance (each party’s age, health, needs, incomes, skills, standard of living)divorcenet.com. No fixed formula or cap; judges decide equitable amounts and terms case-by-casedivorcenet.comdivorcenet.com.

Pennsylvania: No ongoing formula for final alimony. (Prior to 2019, a type of Annualized Prior Support used rigid formulas, but current law leaves awards to discretion.) Courts consider the 17 statutory factors in 23 Pa.C.S. §3701(b): each party’s income and earning capacity, age, health, vocational skills, assets, needs (marital standard of living), length of marriage, contributions as homemaker, marital misconduct, tax consequences, and ability of the supported spouse to become self-supportingdivorcenet.comdivorcenet.com. Under pre-2019 rules, spousal support was calculated as 33.3% of A minus 25% of B (per SNAP) or 25%–30%, but now the formula (for prior temporary support) is only advisory. Courts set amount and duration (often a fixed term or until remarriage) based on fairness. No fixed percentage cap for permanent awards – judges set support according to need.

Rhode Island: No formula. R.I. Gen. Laws §15‑5‑16 tells courts to “fix alimony in such amount” as is “just and reasonable,” considering factors: marital duration, conduct, each party’s age/health/income, standard of living, liabilities, and needslaw.justia.com. It also identifies hardships (custodial care of a young child, loss of career opportunities, and training needed) and payor’s ability to paylaw.justia.comlaw.justia.com. Awards are modifiable and usually terminate on remarriage. There is no statutory percentage; amounts are tailored to the parties’ situationlaw.justia.comlaw.justia.com.

South Carolina: No formula. South Carolina statutes (S.C. Code §20‑3‑130(C)) direct the court to consider length of marriage, ages/health, education/earning capacity, marital standard of living, each party’s financial needs and obligations, contributions to the marriage, and marital faultdivorcenet.com. Tax consequences and existing support obligations are also considereddivorcenet.com. Spousal support awards are discretionary and usually end on death or remarriage of the recipient. No fixed percentage or duration limit is imposed by law.

South Dakota: No formula. SDCL §25‑4‑45 lists factors: length of marriage; each spouse’s earning capacity and training needs; financial status (incl. property division); age/health; marital standard of living; and marital faultdivorcenet.com. For rehabilitative support, courts also look at contributions to the other’s education and the marriage length post-educationdivorcenet.com. The court awards maintenance only as needed; support is typically temporary. There is no statutory cap – judges set the term and amount based on equity.

Tennessee: No single formula. Tennessee defines four types of alimony: rehabilitative, in futuro (permanent), transitional, and in solido (lump-sum). If one spouse needs support, the court considers factors (Tenn. Code §36‑5‑121(i)): each spouse’s earning capacity, age, health, education, career sacrifices, length of marriage, standard of living, and time needed to become self-supportingdivorcenet.comdivorcenet.com. Alimony may be awarded for a term, indefinitely, or as a lump sum depending on these factors. There is no set percentage or cap; the amount and duration are set to achieve fairness.

Texas: Texas allows spousal maintenance only in limited cases (e.g. after a marriage of ≥10 years or in cases of family violence). The amount may not exceed the lesser of $5,000 per month or 20% of the paying spouse’s average monthly gross incomedivorcenet.com. Other factors (Tex. Fam. Code §8.051) include each spouse’s ability to meet needs, length of marriage, education, employment history, contributions to the marriage, and fault (including family violence)divorcenet.com. Maintenance terms are capped at 5 or 10 years depending on marriage length. Thus, aside from the statutory 20%/$5K cap, support is discretionary within those limitsdivorcenet.com.

Utah: No fixed formula. Utah law (Utah Code §30‑3‑5) lists factors: the recipient spouse’s needs and financial condition, vocational skills and education, the payor’s ability to pay, marital standard of living, marriage length, contributions to the marriage, and each party’s age and healthlaw.justia.com. Fault or misconduct may be considered. Alimony is limited to the marriage length absent aggravating circumstanceslaw.justia.com. Courts use these factors to fix a fair support order; there is no statutory percentage or cap beyond those constraints.

Vermont: No formula. Vermont statute (15 VSA §752) requires considering: each spouse’s income and assets, time needed to acquire employment skills, marital standard of living, length of marriage, age/health, and ability to paydivorcenet.com. Cost-of-living adjustments (inflation) are explicitly authorized. (Prior to 2021, judges also weighed the statutory gross-income ratio guideline.) Courts set awards to meet the dependent spouse’s needs within those factors. There is no predetermined percentage or cap.

Virginia: Temporary support (pendente lite) uses a statutory formula: with minor children, 26% of payor’s income minus 58% of payee’s; without children, 27% minus 50% (subject to a $10,000/month cap). For permanent (post-divorce) support, judges consider Virginia Code §20‑107.1 factors: each party’s incomes/assets, marital standard of living, length, age/health, and contributions. By rule, if the marriage is <10 years, no maintenance is reserved; if ≥10 years, maintenance reserve is typically 50% of the marriage lengthlaw.lis.virginia.gov. Awards end on remarriage or death. Outside the guideline and guideline-like presumptions, there is no fixed percentage; Virginia’s approach combines the temporary formula with judicial discretion on final awards.

Washington: No formula. RCW 26.09.090 allows “such maintenance as the court deems just,” without regard to marital faultapp.leg.wa.gov. Statutory factors include: the dependent spouse’s resources (including property and child support), time needed for training/education, marital standard of living, marriage length, each spouse’s age/health, and the payor’s ability to meet needs while maintaining own obligationsapp.leg.wa.gov. Awards can be fixed-term or rehabilitative; indefinite awards are rare and depend on these factors. No mandatory percentage or cap is specified.

West Virginia: No formula. WV statutes require need and ability, then direct courts to consider many factors (W.Va. Code §§48‑6‑301 and 48‑8‑104) – essentially each spouse’s income/resources, marriage length, age/health, vocational skills, contributions, and conduct, among ~20 factorsdivorcenet.com. Awards are discretionary, subject to change on remarriage. No set percentage; courts award whatever “fair spousal support” the situation demandsdivorcenet.com.

Wisconsin: No formula. Wisconsin courts look at factors in Wis. Stat. §767.56: length of marriage, each spouse’s age and health, vocational skills, earning capacity and needs, separate property, marital standard of living, property division, and other relevant considerations. Fault is not considered. Alimony (now called maintenance) is typically rehabilitative (temporary) for short marriages and can be longer for long marriages, but judges have wide discretion. There is no statutory percentage or limit; amounts are set to equalize incomes as much as reasonable.

Wyoming: No formula; courts may award “reasonable alimony” as part of an equitable divorce settlementwomenslaw.org. Wyoming statutes (Wyo. Stat. §20‑2‑114) say the court should consider each spouse’s income and property division, and the paying spouse’s ability to paywomenslaw.org. In practice judges weigh the spouses’ incomes, standard of living, length of marriage, and contributions. Support can be periodic or lump-sum (“assign part of estate” if needed)womenslaw.org. There is no fixed percentage or formula – judges fashion the award equitably based on the circumstances.